Falling Sphere with Air Resistance Proportional to v² Developed by K. Roos This set of exercises requires the student to generate a computational model of the 1D motion of a spherical object dropped from a tall building, and then graph and analyze the output of the model. It also guides the student in exploring the accuracy of a computational algorithm by comparing the computational results with an exact solution obtained analytically. The numerical approach used is the simple Euler method. Exercises Exercise 1: Computational Model of a Falling Sphere with Air resistance Produce a working computational model of a sphere that has been dropped from rest from a very tall building using the simple Euler method. Assume that the sphere will move entirely in one dimension, and that it is subject to the constant gravitational force near Earth's surface and to a resistive force proportional to the square of the sphere's instantaneous speed. Exercise 2: Accuracy of Computational Model: Velocity vs. Time Since the computational approach is based on an approximation, it is important to determine just how small At should be for the approximation to accurately solve the 1D air resistance problem. Make a comparison between the time dependence of the velocity predicted by the computational model, and that predicted by the exact result, 2mg tanh vy(t)= DoA DoAg 2m Use parameters that describe a 16-pound bowling ball (you should look up the diameter, and convert to meters), and let it fall a distance equivalent to the height of the Sears, oops - Willis, tower (440 m). Assume the ball is initially at rest. Use a value of 0.5 for the drag coefficient, and the density of air near sea level. What value of At do you deem to be sufficiently small for the computational model to be accurate? Explain how you arrived at this value of At. Exercise 3: Accuracy of Computational Model: Position vs. Time Carry out the same comparison (computational vs. exact analytical solution) for the bowling ball's position as a function of time. The exact result for the ball's position is given by 2m In cosh DoAg 2m y(t) = DQA Assume the bowling ball is falling the same distance of 440 m. Do you find the same value of At, as found for the velocity comparison of Exercise 2, to be acceptable for the position comparison? Exercise 4: Position and Velocity of Dropped Bowling Ball Produce plots of the bowling ball's velocity and vertical position as functions of time from the results of the computational model, using the parameters from the previous exercises and the value of At (determined in Exercises 2 and 3) that produces a tolerably accurate computational solution. Has the bowling ball reached its terminal velocity by the time it hits the ground? Use your model to predict the time required for the bowling ball to fall the full 440 meters to the ground. Exercise 5: Position and Velocity of Dropped Basketball Repeat Exercise 3 using the parameters for a basketball in your model (you will have to be resourceful and look up the weight and diameter of a typical basketball). How does the behavior of the basketball compare to that of the bowling ball? Exercise 6: Position and Velocity of Dropped Baseball Repeat Exercise 3 using the parameters for a baseball (again, look up the relevant parameters). How does the behavior of the baseball compare to that of the bowling ball and basketball? Exercise 7: Assessing Computational Accuracy in the Absence of an Analytical Solution In practice, computational models are produced to describe the dynamics of systems for which an exact analytical solution is very likely unknown. Based on your observations of the behavior of the model as At gets smaller, can you suggest a procedure that could be used to assess the accuracy of a computational model in the event that you have no analytical curve with which to compare the computational result? Be very detailed in describing the procedure.